News:

Friday, November 6, 2009 6:02 PM EST

Local health care professionals concerned about Congress’ plans

 
More News

Sheriff’s Office seeking information on skeletal remains

Twin Tier schools dealing with flu

Machias Part 1: A look back at Machias

Mayor dismisses rumor, explains city can’t close Fire Station One

East Olean sewer project going out to bid soon

Sayegh leaves county post to become JCC dean

Guess who’s lone bidder on land in Farmersville

Gift Tree taking root for holiday season

Some familiar - and new faces on Legislature

Supervisor Eaton emerges from confusing night as apparent winner

Witte wins - absentee ballots still out, however

DA Parker easily wins new term in Allegany County

Jones ousts Smith; Kayes retains Common Council seat

Rieman upends Sharkey to become district attorney

Despite long odds of comeback, Carucci not conceding

Heitzenrater doesn’t rule out landfill option

Vaccine shortage greets county’s new health chief

Cattaraugus County’s initial budget: 4.8 percent tax hike

Different approach to learning being tested

Local promoters staging MMA event on Seneca reservation

Local health care professionals concerned about Congress’ plans

New hospital system official in Olean, Bradford

Greater Olean honors some of area’s best

Features of the Olean Times Herald Web site

OLEAN - As yet another round of health care reform bills hit the two congressional chambers in Washington, local health care professionals have concerns that have not been mentioned thus far in the debate.

In fact, some believe some of the more important issues have been neglected.

Olean Medical Group Chief Medical Officer John Camus said there are a couple of areas that need to be addressed for reform to be meaningful.

“One of the largest areas that needs to be fixed is the Medicare Physicians Payment System,” he said.

The system is the way health care providers are reimbursed for services to those on Medicare.

“Currently, medical professionals are looking at 2010 cuts in payment by 21.5 percent, with more proposed in subsequent years,” he said.

The segment of the population covered by Medicare are patients who have various health issues resulting from aging, and it takes more time to treat them, Mr. Camus said.

“While I agree that the expanded coverage is a good thing, it will bring issues of access,” he said. “We already have a difficult time recruiting (health care professionals) in this area. This will bring more patients in to doctors being paid less, as their Medicare payments are decreasing.”

Dr. Gilbert Witte, a doctor of pulmonology, internal medicine and critical care medicine at the Olean Medical Group and Cattaraugus County medical director, said that access brings more to the table than just compensation.

“One of the biggest issues that needs to be examined is access,” he said. “Not just having insurance, but access to the care needed.”

The lack of access in the form that Dr. Witte speaks about has the potential to create larger health conditions, he said.

“I have patients who have stopped taking medications because they couldn’t afford it,” he said. “For some, they have insurance, but it doesn’t cover what they need, or they fall into that Medicaid ‘doughnut hole.’ Some patients do not take the medicines their heart doctor prescribes. These things lead to poor quality of health, and that is inexcusable in a country like the United States. We need affordable, quality health care. That is the bottom line.”

The solution?

Mr. Camus believes that the reversal of the trend could come in offering more of an incentive to the physicians who work with the elderly segment of the population.

Another point of reform that should be undertaken is medical liability, or malpractice, reform, Mr. Camus said.

“We want doctors to be able to treat their patients the way they should be treated without the threat of liability claims,” he said.

Changes in tort reform law haven’t been brought into the discussion in Washington, but Dr. Witte said that is an area that could offer another avenue to bringing down medical costs.

“Would I like to see tort reform? Sure, but it cuts both ways,” he said. “Studies have shown that cases that go to court for malpractice are not malpractice. The same studies have also shown that people trying to be compensated for medical mistakes aren’t always recognized. The system fails both ways.”

Several states have boards that look at possible malpractice cases before they make it to a courtroom, Dr. Witte said.

“Some (states) have panels of physicians, lay people and lawyers to decide the merit of the case before it gets to that level,” he said.

Dr. Witte said he also favors one of the options that has long been taken out of the bill, the single-payer option.

“I like the idea of a single-payer system, but that isn’t even on the agenda,” he said. “It doesn’t have to be a Canadian system, or England’s system. It doesn’t have to be anyone else’s system but ours.”

The single-payer system would have a single entity, the government in existing systems, collect the payment for medical services and disburse it to medical professionals.

Dr. Witte said he sees this as a means to make people understand what the status of health care should be.

“People have the right to decent health care, and we need to find a way to realize that,” he said.

Another controversial point in the health care system has gained the favor of Dr. Witte as well.

“I am in favor of a public option, something like Medicare,” he said. “It is not a perfect system ... but Medicare offers unprecedented coverage to a large group of people.”

Dr. Witte has been practicing medicine for 29 years.

Efforts to reach other doctors in the area went unanswered.

Two proposed bills are making their way through Congress. The Democratic bill as offered by Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, D-California, is nearly 2,000 pages long, and would cost $1 trillion over 10 years to implement. The Republican bill as offered by House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, weighs in at 219 pages and will cost a mere $15 billion to implement.

A vote on the Pelosi-proposed plan is expected to take place over the weekend.

(Contact reporter Chris Chapman at cchapman@oleantimesherald.com)

Reader Comments

There are 5 comment(s) comments to this story.
The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the view of bradfordera.com.

ridiculous wrote on Nov 6, 2009 8:33 PM:

" the last paragraph is terrible. the repub bill is "merely" 15 billion. guess what, it wouldn't expand coverage. and it would not cut the deficit as much as the democratic bill would. "

gary wrote on Nov 7, 2009 4:04 PM:

" P.S. The republican bill Also does not address" preexisting conditions" and it does very little to try to contain cost. One last final thought it drasticaly reduces your ability to sue the doctor if he happens to cut of your left leg rather than the right one! "

Oldtimer wrote on Nov 7, 2009 5:16 PM:

" A Single Payer System is ridiculous. Olean Medical Group Chief Medical Officer John Camus is correct and right on target for All of America!!! "

Vernon Clayson wrote on Nov 8, 2009 12:15 AM:

" Ridiculous speaks of cutting the deficit, what dream world does he live in? Government control of health care by any means or description will cost taxpayers more than any of the current entitlements and they are, one and all,
failing or in dire straits. Ridiculous seems unaware that the government has no money except for what they take from citizens in taxes and fees. This so-called health care bill doesn't guarantee anyone better health or any better access to care, we will be numerical factors, not patients, treated under consideration of actuarial tables. If Ridiculous doesn't need to see a doctor for a year or two or five, he will still have to pay the tax (that is what it is) because someone else will visit a doctor. Government fees and taxes do not go down, what it costs now will seem like a trifle in ten years. "

MedProf wrote on Nov 8, 2009 1:07 PM:

" Tort reform NEEDS to happen -- why do you think it is so hard to recruit OB/GYNs? Baby has Downs, its the doctors fault, baby has FAS, doctors fault. Add into the mix a large portion of the population who probably has never seen a medical professional, we face increasing lawsuits (jeeze, I didn't know that smoking 3 packs a day will kill me?!) People need to understand that this whole bill will drastically HURT communities like this. Cutting doctor's pay (after we spend upwards of $200k for medical school, plus maybe $50-100k for undergrad) and expect to make $90k/yr as primary care physicians but still have to worry about losing everything we have? Yeah, not happening for this doc. "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)